|
I liked the book, but not as much as I thought I would. I like the topic, as I think the author definitely is on to something with the trend toward independent consulting and small businesses representing such a large portion of America's enterprise activity. However, I wasn't too impressed by his latching on to Maslow's Heirarchy as his main metphore- given that it's so outdated and lacks any real scientific validity. It was a good book with many good points, but it didn't live up to my expectations.
This includes taking initiative to develop new skills, even funding training out of your own pocket. First, even in a challenging, then recovering economy, there are many opportunities for "nanocorps" that can offer quick, flexible service to corporations that don't want to bring those services inside. He claims that this is a growing trend in the American workforce and explores the lifestyles, business plans, and satisfaction of these independent workers.We are no longer in the "new economy" of 2002 and the playing field has changed a bit. We are more occupationally and financially secure if we listen to this advice.A final thought.
In the reviewer's opinion, it remains relevant for three reasons. Daniel Pink reports the results of his background research and a large number of interviews with "free agents" who work for themselves as consultants, contractors, and small businesses of one. It may include purchasing your own computer equipment, reference materials and business cards when your employer will not. Some, perhaps many, will go underground to become economic partisans, fighting their own low-profile war for survival. Second, the recent economic pressures have spurred many to pursue after-hours work in a second job that supplements their daytime paycheck.
This book encourages all of us to prepare for portability to another organization--or to no organization. I wonder if a new version of the book will be released as "Black Market Nation."This book is recommended. Is this book still worth reading. As we move into an era of increased government regulation, what will happen to free agents. Much of the author's advice is relevant to members of this second-shift workforce who don't have to entirely support themselves as free agents.The third and best reason to read this book applies to those working for large companies as well as free agents, second-shifters, and other independents.
Even if you are in a seemingly secure job, you should take a large measure of responsibility for your own career, thinking like a free agent or as someone who may become one with very little notice. It is unlikely all will be absorbed into large organizations, even if the regulatory environment becomes unfriendly to small businesses. The author's latest thinking about the workforce can be found on the "Fast Company" web site and in his latest book, Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us.
Watch Video Here: http://www.amazon.com/review/R2DSD4ECEZBYTR Austin Brockmeier's review was made as part of a critical review assignment for the Spring 2009 Economics of Technology seminar at the University of Nebraska at Omaha, taught by Art Diamond. (The course syllabus stated that part of the critical review assignment consisted of the making of a video recording of the review, and the posting of the review to Amazon).
Daniel had examined the process of more and more people leaving the employ of large corporations and going out on their own. The Long Tail). For example, they create their work schedule so they can take their kids to school and pick them up in the afternoon. balancing is very powerful and gives me a great way to talk to my clients about how to manage their time when they are working on their own. 3. It involves a revolving set of business relationships that coalesce over individual projects.
2. The network creates opportunities for referral business, but more importantly it creates connections to the "partners" that can help the free agent complete a project.Daniel makes me feel good about my career choice by pointing out the importance of coaches in a work/life structure that's very fluid and exposes individuals to a lot more risk (no more hiding behind a veil of corporate security). Prosperity allowed people to work for meaning, not just money. Many of these individuals fall into my description of the new entrepreneur.Daniel points out 4 factors that have helped shift many people into free agency during the end of the twentieth and the beginning of the twenty-first century: 1. It's something that I've been seeing in my business and my clients' businesses over the past few years.
The social contract of work (security for loyalty) crumbled. Some of them might not even have a choice, as corporations downsize and contract out much of their work.Upon hearing about my idea, my friend Betsy recommended that I pick up Daniel Pink's Free Agent Nation. Another reason for health care reform.The idea of blending vs. This is someone who starts their own business, not because they have the entrepreneurial drive to start businesses, but rather because they provide a service and they prefer to work in an independent capacity. It reinforces that one of the most important components to success as a free agent is the strength of a person's network. The means of production were democratized (cf. The idea of creating balance seems to stress people out more because they think they have to work at it (and their afraid they'll fall out of balance).I think this is a fun read for someone who is a free agent, or for someone in corporate HR who is wondering how to work with the ever-increasing population of free agents. The half-life of organizations shrunk.
Over the past few months I have been developing the idea of what I call the "new entrepreneur". As he says: "In a sense, coaches are shrinks without the couches, management consultants without the flow charts, and sympathetic bartenders without the shot glasses" (pg 181).Did you know that the American system of tying health insurance to your job is an historical accident, and doesn't have logical precedent (the US is the only Western country that does this). It keeps a lot of people tied to jobs they're not happy with and are unproductive in. I've seen it a lot already, where a person will work in spurts throughout the day to include family responsibilities. What this has really done is changed many work relationships from vertical (working in a hierarchical corporation) to horizontal (working with equal partners to accomplish specific objectives). Daniel does a bit of predicting, which even in the 5 years since Free Agent Nation was written has been pretty off. He calls these individuals "free agents" because they are free to work on their own terms, and their experiences can vary from a temp working as a secretary to a graphic designer running their own media company. Besides that, though, he provides a great snapshot of the dynamic process of economic evolution in the U.S.
4. And with the continuing changes in the American economy, I think that this pattern will become more prevalent in the near future.One thing that stood out strongly was the free agent org chart. I think that looking at the process as blending is a lot less stressful than trying to create balance. in the last twenty years.
At a macro level Dan Pinks view of the "free agent nation" is interesting. A peek into a few more examples of how individuals were making sustainable transitions away from the main stream. The information is well presented and opens a vault of thought and consideration for taking a closer look at micro business. I was looking for more case studies. I looked to this title for inspiration and it didn't deliver to my expectations. A good read, but not compelling enough to re-visit.
|
